Clinical Report: The Promise of Artificial Intelligence to Aid in Systematic Reviews

Overview

This report examines the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in systematic reviews, particularly focusing on the Scopus AI tool. The findings suggest that AI can significantly streamline the literature search process, enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of systematic reviews in oncology.

Background

Systematic reviews are essential for advanced practice providers (APPs) as they synthesize research and guide clinical decision-making. The increasing volume of systematic reviews, particularly in oncology, necessitates innovative approaches to manage and analyze large datasets. AI tools like Scopus AI offer promising solutions to optimize the methodology of systematic reviews, potentially improving the quality and speed of evidence synthesis.

Data Highlights

No specific numerical data was provided in the article.

Key Findings

• AI can enhance the efficiency of systematic reviews by processing large datasets.
• Scopus AI was introduced in 2024 as a tool to assist in literature searches.
• Comparative studies show that AI tools like DistillerSR AI perform comparably to human reviewers in selecting articles for systematic reviews.
• The NICE position statement emphasizes the need for careful consideration of AI's use in evidence synthesis.
• AI tools can reveal patterns in data that may not be apparent to human analysts.

Clinical Implications

The integration of AI tools like Scopus AI can significantly reduce the time and effort required for systematic reviews, allowing APPs to focus on clinical decision-making. However, it is crucial to maintain human oversight to ensure the rigor and transparency of the review process.

Conclusion

AI presents a transformative opportunity for systematic reviews, particularly in oncology, but careful implementation and oversight are essential to balance benefits with potential concerns.

References

1. Weed, 2018 -- Systematic reviews in clinical practice
2. Burns et al., 2024 -- Evidence-based systematic reviews
3. van dijk et al., 2023 -- Methodology of systematic reviews
4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE], 2024 -- AI in evidence synthesis
5. Bolaños et al., 2024 -- AI systems in literature retrieval
6. aace endocrine ai — Stop pretending AI peer review isn’t happening
7. Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) — Performance of AI Tools in Citing Retracted Literature : Content Analysis
8. Updates in Surgery — Current Trends and Future Directions in the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Pain Management: A Bibliometric and Visual Review
9. Updates in Surgery — Analysis of Bibliometric Trends in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Surgery Over the Past Decade
10. JMIR AI - Transparent Reporting of AI in Systematic Literature Reviews
11. Accelerate your workflow with Deep Research, a new Scopus AI feature
12. Optimal large language models to screen citations for systematic reviews | Research Synthesis Methods | Cambridge Core